United States v. Kresimir Mendoza

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 202422-50188California506 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 20 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50188

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 5:21-cr-00202-PA-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

KRESIMIR MENDOZA,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 15, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: GOULD, N.R. SMITH, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Kresimir Mendoza appeals his below-Guidelines sentence of 240 months’

imprisonment in connection with his plea of guilty to one count of stalking and one

count of production of child pornography. We review the district court’s decision

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). for plain error because Mendoza did not raise his objections before the district

court. United States v. Campbell, 937 F.3d 1254,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.