United States v. Dawniel Santangelo

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 202422-10270California803 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 20 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-10270

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:19-cr-00125-KJM-2 v.

DAWNIEL SANTANGELO, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 15, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, CALLAHAN, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Defendant-Appellant Dawniel Santangelo appeals from her conviction and

sentence for sex trafficking three teenage girls in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1594(c), and 2423(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. On appeal,

Santangelo disputes two evidentiary rulings made during trial.

We review preserved…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.