Joseph Cuviello v. City of Belmont
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 202423-16135California858 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MAY 20 2024
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSEPH PATRICK CUVIELLO, No. 23-16135
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:23-cv-00029-LB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
CITY OF BELMONT; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Laurel D. Beeler, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 16, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: S.R. THOMAS, CALLAHAN, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff-Appellant Joseph Patrick Cuviello appeals the district court’s denial
of his motion for a preliminary injunction on his section 1983 retaliation claim
against Defendant-Appellee Brigitte Shearer, the head of the City of Belmont’s
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Parks and Recreation Department. The district court had jurisdiction over