People v. Dearborn CA4/1

STATEMENT OF FACTS

This appeal is from a guilty plea. Dearborn’s statement to the court admitted he exhibited a deadly weapon at a police officer to prevent his arrest.

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has submitted a Wende brief and asks the court to review the record for error. To assist the court in its review, and in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel has identified several possible issues for our consideration. 1. Whether the trial court erred in issuing a stay-away order from 515 Washington Street. 2. Whether the trial court erred in imposing a condition of probation requiring Dearborn to take psychotropic medication as prescribed by his doctor. 3. Whether the condition requiring Dearborn not to possess controlled substances was invalid to the extent it would prevent him from using medically prescribed marijuana. 4. Whether the court erred in finding Dearborn had the ability to pay fines and fees as ordered by the trial court. We have reviewed the record for error as required by Wende and Anders. We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Dearborn…