Paknad

Paknad v. Superior Court CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 20, 2024H050711MCalifornia6,648 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lie, J.

Filed 5/20/24 Paknad v. Superior Court CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

MICHELLE PAKNAD, No. H050711 (Santa Clara County Petitioner, Super. Ct. No. 19CV350641)

v.

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF AND DENYING REHEARING

CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA

CLARA, [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

Respondent,

INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., et al.,

Real Parties in Interest.

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed April 29, 2024, be modified as follows: On page 3, line 4, the section heading “A. Allegations of the Operative Complaint,” is modified to read: “A. Paknad’s Allegations in the Trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.