Dopp

Dopp v. Now Optics CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 20, 2024D081665California5,929 words

Opinion

Opinion

Buchanan, J.

Filed 5/20/24 Dopp v. Now Optics CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ALLISON DOPP, D081665

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2022- 00022391-CU-OE-CTL) NOW OPTICS, LLC et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEALS from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Joel Wohlfeil, Judge. Affirmed. Polsinelli, Noel S. Cohen, September Rea, J. Alan Warfield, and Armida Derzakarian for Defendants and Appellants. Pancer Law Corporation and Ian Pancer for Plaintiff and Respondent. Defendants Now Optics, LLC (Now Optics), Vision Precision Holdings, LLC (Vision Precision), and two of their supervisorial employees, Alexander Sanchez and Amy Koger, appeal from an order denying…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.