People v. Daoud CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 20, 2024F086962California1,036 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/20/24 P. v. Daoud CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

F086962

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. F21906933) v.

AMR AHMAD DAOUD, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT*

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Samuel Dalesandro, Judge. Heather E. Shallenberger, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo-

* Before Franson, Acting P. J., Meehan, J. and DeSantos, J. Appellate counsel for defendant Amr Ahmad Daoud has filed an opening brief summarizing the pertinent facts and raising no issues but asking this court to review the record…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.