Littlefield

Roscoe Littlefield v. County of Humboldt

Good Law
159 Cal. Rptr. 3d 731·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 589·218 Cal. App. 4th 243·2013 WL 3865594·13 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7990
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 28, 2013A135628California5,118 words

Opinion

Opinion

Siggins, J.

Sheriff’s deputies seized and destroyed approximately 1,500 pounds of marijuana under cultivation in a remote area of Humboldt County (the County). Plaintiffs Roscoe, Sylvia, Richard and Timothy Littlefield and Jeffrey Libertini, each of whom has a written physician’s recommendation for up to two ounces of marijuana per day, sued the County for conversion and violation of their constitutional and statutory rights to be free from unreasonable search and seizure and deprivation of property without due process. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court found the deputies had probable cause for the seizure, that the County lawfully destroyed the cannabis, and that plaintiffs failed to proffer admissible evidence that their possession was lawful. It accordingly granted the County’s motion and denied plaintiffs’ motion. We agree and affirm.

BACKGROUND

The facts are largely undisputed. Humboldt County Sheriff’s deputies, assisted by CAMP (Campaign Against Marijuana Planting) agents, conducted open field marijuana eradication operations in a remote area of Humboldt County. Following aerial surveillance, deputies and CAMP agents entered a garden that contained 118…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.