United States v. James Cloud
102 F.4th 968
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 21, 202422-30044California7,103 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-30044
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. Nos. 1:19-cr-02032- v. SMJ-1 1:19-cr-02032-
JAMES DEAN CLOUD, SMJ
Defendant-Appellee. OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Salvador Mendoza, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 8, 2023 Seattle, Washington
Filed May 21, 2024
Before: M. Margaret McKeown, N. Randy Smith, and Gabriel P. Sanchez, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge McKeown SUMMARY *
Criminal Law/Sanctions
The panel affirmed the district court’s order, imposed under its exercise of supervisory powers, directing the Government to pay monetary sanctions as reimbursement for the time spent getting to the bottom of the Government’s nondisclosure of information suggesting that its star witness in a criminal trial was willing to shape her testimony in exchange for certain benefits. The panel held that this court has appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 because the…