United States v. Paul Wagner

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 21, 202422-15925California944 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 21 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-15925 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:10-cr-00399-MMD-GWF-1 2:19-cv-01540-MMD v.

PAUL WAGNER, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 17, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, CALLAHAN, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Defendant-Appellant Paul Wagner appeals the district court’s denial of his

motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence for bank and wire fraud

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Wagner alleges that he was denied his Sixth

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Amendment right to conflict-free counsel because his trial attorney,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.