Vicente Rodriguez v. Jeff Lynch

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 21, 202422-16876California971 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 21 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VICENTE PRADO-RODRIGUEZ, No. 22-16876

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:20-cv-07762-YGR v.

JEFF LYNCH, Warden, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent-Appellee.

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA,

Real Party In Interest.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 14, 2024** San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: LEE and BRESS, Circuit Judges, and TUNHEIM,*** Senior District Judge.

Petitioner Vicente Prado-Rodriguez (Prado-Rodriguez) appeals the district

court’s denial of his habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, arguing (1) his

mandatory sentence of life without the possibility of parole violates his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.