Rodriguez Jimenez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 21, 202421-740California975 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 21 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FULGENCIO RODRIGUEZ JIMENEZ, No. 21-740 Agency No. Petitioner, A073-923-004 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 17, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: GOULD and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and HINDERAKER, District Judge.***

Petitioner Fulgencio Rodriguez Jimenez, a native and citizen of Mexico,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable John Charles Hinderaker, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. petitions for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying Rodriguez Jimenez’s

applications for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.