Palomino-Espinoza

Palomino-Espinoza v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 21, 202422-786California664 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 21 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EVANGELINA PALOMINO-ESPINOZA, No. 22-786 Agency No. Petitioner, A090-217-004 v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 17, 2024** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: GRABER, DESAI, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Evangelina Palomino-Espinoza is a native and citizen of Mexico.

She timely seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of

her motion to reconsider its prior decision, which denied an earlier motion to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). reopen deportation proceedings.1 Reviewing legal questions de novo and

otherwise reviewing for abuse of discretion, Cano-Merida v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.