Ruiz Godor v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 202422-2080California554 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 22 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS EDUARDO RUIZ GODOR, No. 22-2080 AKA Carlos Eduardo Ruiz Godoy, Agency No.

A205-411-468

Petitioner,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 17, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: COLLINS, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Carlos Eduardo Ruiz Godor petitions for review of a decision of the Board

of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming a decision by an Immigration Judge

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“IJ”) denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection

under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Because the BIA affirmed without

opinion, we review the IJ’s decision directly. See 8…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.