Hartman
Hartman v. Hartman CA1/4
Opinion
Opinion
Goldman, J.
BACKGROUND
On September 8, 2022, Hartman filed a motion to compel Melnichenko’s compliance with a deposition subpoena for production of business records (subpoena) and for sanctions. A declaration attached to the motion states that the subpoena was served on Melnichenko twice, first at Melnichenko’s request by email on March 14, 2022, and the second time by personal service on July 10. On January 20, 2023, Melnichenko filed a declaration in opposition to the motion to compel asserting that he had not been served with the subpoena prior to December 26, 2022, when it was served along with the motion to compel. Following a hearing on January 31, 2023, the trial court granted the motion to compel and ordered Melnichenko to pay Hartman’s attorney fees and costs as sanctions based on Melnichenko’s willful failure to comply with the subpoena. A written order was entered and served on April 14, 2023, after which Melnichenko timely filed a notice of appeal.
DISCUSSION
The trial court ordered Melnichenko to pay $12,866.70 in sanctions pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure2 sections 2025.480, subdivision (j) and 2023.030, subdivision (a). Section 2025.480, subdivision (j), provides that a…