Esmelin Vasquez-Antunez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 202418-71617California478 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ESMELIN MARILIA VASQUEZ- No. 18-71617

ANTUNEZ,

Agency No. A208-294-284 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 21, 2024**

Before: OWENS, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Esmelin Marilia Vasquez-Antunez and her minor child are natives and

citizens of Honduras. They petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(BIA) order denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.

1. Asylum and Withholding of Removal:…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.