Teague

Teague v. Easton CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 23, 2024D081242California6,423 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rourke, J.

Filed 5/23/24 Teague v. Easton CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

JOANNA TEAGUE, D081242

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2021-00022217-PR-TR-CTL)

SHAWN EASTON,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Matthew C. Braner, Judge. Appeal dismissed. Niddrie Addams Fuller Singh and John S. Addams; The Stone Law Group and Kenneth H. Stone for Defendant and Appellant. Law Office of John A. Adler and John A. Adler; Law Office of A. Daniel Bacalski, Jr. and A. Daniel Bacalski, Jr.; Dubé Law Office and Douglas Dubé for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Plaintiff and respondent Joanna Teague filed a Probate Code1 section 17200 petition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.