Solis

Solis v. Sohnen Enterprises CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 23, 2024B323296California6,824 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/23/24 Solis v. Sohnen Enterprises CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

CANDIDA SOLIS, B323296

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. v. No. 21STCV26265)

SOHNEN ENTERPRISES, INC., et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Timothy P. Dillon, Judge. Reversed. Wolflick, Khachaturian & Bouayad, Gregory D. Wolflick and Theodore S. Khachaturian for Defendants and Appellants. Moon Law Group, Kane Moon, Christopher L. Garcia and Sara Salinas for Plaintiff and Respondent.

____________________ After an employer failed to pay arbitration costs within…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.