Shick

Shick v. Forooghieh CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 23, 2024B323432California6,044 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/23/24 Shick v. Forooghieh CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

PARIS SHICK, B323432

Plaintiff and Respondent, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 22VERO01001 v.

ALI FOROOGHIEH,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Laura Streimer, Commissioner. Affirmed.

Ali Forooghieh, in pro.per., for Defendant and Appellant.

Paris Shick, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Respondent.

_______________________ In a long-running dispute between neighbors that resulted in dueling petitions for civil harassment restraining orders (Code Civ. Proc.,1 § 527.6), Ali Forooghieh appeals the issuance of a restraining order against him.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.