United States v. Jaime Collazo Munoz

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 24, 202423-10041California938 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-10041

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:21-cr-00010-MMD-CLB-1 v.

JAIME COLLAZO MUNOZ, AKA Chivo, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 16, 2024 Phoenix, Arizona

Before: GRABER, DESAI, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Defendant Jaime Collazo Munoz appeals his convictions for two counts of

fentanyl distribution, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(vi), and his

sentence of 60 months’ imprisonment. We affirm.

1. The district court neither manifestly erred nor abused its discretion in

striking a prospective juror for cause. See United States v. Kechedzian, 902 F.3d

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1023, 1027 (9th Cir. 2018) (stating standard of review). The prospective…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.