Jane Doe v. Daniel Fitzgerald
102 F.4th 1089
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 24, 202422-56216California6,943 words
Opinion
Opinion
Ikuta, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JANE DOE, Nos. 1-10, No. 22-56216
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-10713- v. MWF-RAO
DANIEL S. FITZGERALD,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellant,
US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW
YORK,
Real-party-in-interest- Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 29, 2024 Pasadena, California
Filed May 24, 2024 Before: Ronald M. Gould, Sandra S. Ikuta, and Danielle J. Forrest, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Ikuta
SUMMARY *
Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act
The panel affirmed the district court’s order staying proceedings in an action under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act pending the resolution of a criminal action. Ten plaintiffs sued Daniel Fitzgerald under the civil remedy provision of the TVPRA, 18 U.S.C. § 1595(a), for multiple sex trafficking violations, among other things. The government intervened and moved to stay the litigation pending the…