People v. Calhoun CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 24, 2024C097276California6,215 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS AND HISTORY OF THE PROCEEDINGS

The prosecution charged defendant with two counts of pandering (Pen. Code, § 266i, subd. (a)(2), unless otherwise stated, statutory section citations that follow are to the Penal Code; counts one and three), one as to an undercover police detective and another as to victim R.D., and one count of pimping (§ 266h, subd. (a); count two) as to R.D. As to counts two and three, the prosecution alleged the victim was particularly vulnerable (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 4.421(a)(3); unless otherwise designated, rule citations are to the California Rules of Court) and defendant took advantage of a position of trust or confidence (rule 4.421(a)(11)). As to all counts, the prosecution alleged the crime involved planning, sophistication, or professionalism (rule 4.421(a)(8)); defendant engaged in violent conduct indicating a serious danger to society (rule 4.421(b)(1)); defendant had prior convictions that were numerous or of increasing seriousness (rule 4.421(b)(2)); and defendant served a prior term in prison or jail (rule 4.421(b)(3)). The prosecution later dismissed the allegation of violent conduct.

At trial, Detective Anthony Figueroa testified as an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.