Cupido

Cupido v. City of Los Angeles CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 24, 2024B326279California5,433 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chaney, J.

BACKGROUND

I. Claim for Damages Presented on Behalf of Plaintiffs’

Mother On May 15, 2021, plaintiffs’ mother, Alicia Flores, allegedly suffered injury when she fell out of a wheelchair and hit her head on a public sidewalk in the City of Los Angeles (the city). Around a week later, on May 21, 2021, Flores died. Within six months of the incident, on November 5, 2021, attorney Isaac Toveg (who represents plaintiffs in this matter) presented a claim for damages to the city (Claim No. C22-02454), listing Flores as the claimant and indicating she had died a week after the May 15, 2021 incident.2 The claim alleges the city caused injury to Flores by “[n]ot maintaining the sidewalk and leaving it in a state of disrepair and . . . riddled with holes and gaps.” According to the claim, Flores’s wheelchair came into contact with a raised portion of an uneven sidewalk, and the impact caused her to fall out of the wheelchair and hit her head on the sidewalk.

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Government

Code. 2 Under the Government Claims Act, a “claim relating to a

cause of action for death or for injury” must be presented to the public entity “not later than six months…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.