Prado-Aquino

Prado-Aquino v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 24, 202423-908California757 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 24 2024

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

GINA DAYANA PRADO-AQUINO; No. 23-908

SARA ELIZABETH HERNANDEZ-

PRADO, Agency Nos. A208-996-755

A208-996-756

Petitioners, v. MEMORANDUM* MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted May 15, 2024 Pasadena, California Before: COLLINS, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges. Gina Dayana Prado-Aquino and her daughter Sara Elizabeth Hernandez-

Prado, both citizens of Honduras, petition for review of a decision by the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the order of the Immigration Judge (“IJ”)

denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection

under the Convention Against Torture (“Torture Convention”).1 We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1 To…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.