Mackel
Mackel v. McDonough CA2/6
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 5/24/24 Mackel v. McDonough CA2/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
VIRGINIA A. MACKEL, 2d Crim. No. B324520 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2021-00556620- Plaintiff and Respondent, CU-WM-VTA) (Ventura County) v.
PAUL MCDONOUGH,
Defendant and Appellant.
Paul McDonough appeals a judgment entered after the trial court granted a motion for a writ of mandate sought by Virginia A. Mackel, the co-manager of four limited liability companies that she and McDonough jointly manage. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085; Corp. Code, § 1603, subd. (a).)1 We affirm. This appeal concerns an amended petition for writ of mandate filed by a co-manager of four limited liability companies