United States v. Wesley Long
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 28, 202423-30022California1,035 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 28 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-30022
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:22-cr-00026-BLW-1 v.
WESLEY VAN LONG, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 23, 2024** Anchorage, Alaska
Before: BYBEE, FRIEDLAND, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Defendant Wesley Van Long (“Long”) appeals his 108-month sentence for
Possession with Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C.
§§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A). We affirm.
We review Long’s sentence for abuse of discretion, asking first whether the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). district court committed “significant procedural error” and then…