United States v. Sedric Williams

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 28, 202422-30155California740 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-30155

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:18-cr-00113-TMB-MMS-1 v.

SEDRIC WILLIAMS, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 23, 2024** Anchorage, Alaska

Before: BYBEE, FRIEDLAND, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Defendant Sedric Williams appeals his conviction for possession with intent

to distribute more than 100 grams of heroin under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1),

(b)(1)(B)(i). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Williams challenges the introduction of certain testimony by Agent Michael

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Burke, the Government’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.