United States v. Samuel Martinez, III

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 28, 202423-50011California584 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 28 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-50011

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No.

CR-21-00067-FLA

v.

SAMUEL MARTINEZ III, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 17, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: GOULD and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and HINDERAKER,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable John Charles Hinderaker, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. Samuel Martinez III appeals the district court’s imposition of an 130-month

sentence in connection with his plea of guilty to possession with intent to distribute

methamphetamine.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.