Huang

Huang v. Pabianova CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 28, 2024B321951California2,520 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Marriage and Dissolution Fang Huang (husband) and Marie Pabianova (wife) married in January 2010. They separated in October 2014, and the judgment of dissolution ending their marriage was entered in January 2018. They have two children—C. (born in 2010) and A. (born in 2012). In their stipulated judgment of dissolution, wife and husband agreed to joint legal and physical custody of the children. B. Earlier Proceedings and Existing DVRO Requests In May 2021, the juvenile court dismissed a Welfare and Institutions Code section 300 petition against husband for insufficient evidence. Wife acknowledged she was the reporting

1 Statutory references are to the Family Code unless otherwise indicated.

2 party. The petition alleged husband physically abused the children. On November 18, 2021, a criminal protective order issued in August 2021 against husband as to his daughter A. was terminated. On November 30, 2021, wife filed a request for a DVRO to protect herself against husband. She described harassment and threats texted by husband in the middle of the night, prompting her to go to the hospital for chest pain and medical tests. On December 10,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.