Phat N Sticky, LLC v. Top Shelf Led, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 29, 202422-36036California554 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 29 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PHAT N STICKY, LLC, No. 22-36036
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00071-SAB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
TOP SHELF LED, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Stanley A. Bastian, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted May 9, 2024 Seattle, Washington
Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and McKEOWN and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Phat N Sticky, LLC (“Phat”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of its
amended complaint with prejudice. In its amended complaint, Phat alleges that Top
Shelf LED, Inc.’s (“Top Shelf”) defective lighting products self-ignited and
destroyed its real and personal property.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. court’s decision on a motion to dismiss. See Cervantes v. Countrywide Home