Phat N Sticky, LLC v. Top Shelf Led, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 29, 202422-36036California554 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 29 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PHAT N STICKY, LLC, No. 22-36036

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00071-SAB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

TOP SHELF LED, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Stanley A. Bastian, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 9, 2024 Seattle, Washington

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and McKEOWN and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Phat N Sticky, LLC (“Phat”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of its

amended complaint with prejudice. In its amended complaint, Phat alleges that Top

Shelf LED, Inc.’s (“Top Shelf”) defective lighting products self-ignited and

destroyed its real and personal property.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. court’s decision on a motion to dismiss. See Cervantes v. Countrywide Home

Loans,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.