Janine Angel v. Cindy Marten

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 29, 202423-55625California911 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 29 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JANINE ANGEL, on behalf of C.A., and No. 23-55625 individually, by and through Guardian ad Litem Dr. Ronald Savage; et al., D.C. No. 2:21-cv-07333-ODW-PVC Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

CINDY MARTEN, in her official capacity as former Superintendent; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 16, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: N.R. SMITH and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges, and HINDERAKER,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable John Charles Hinderaker, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. Janine Angel and other parents of disabled…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.