Nora Phillips v. U.S. Customs and Border Prot.

Good Law
102 F.4th 1110
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 30, 202421-55768California197 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NORA PHILLIPS; ERIKA No. 21-55768

PINHEIRO; NATHANIEL

DENNISON, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-06338- Plaintiffs-Appellants, SVW-JEM

v.

ORDER

U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER

PROTECTION; MARK MORGAN;

UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION

AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT;

MATTHEW ALBENCE; FEDERAL

BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION;

CHRISTOPHER WRAY,

Defendants-Appellees.

Filed May 30, 2024

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Richard C. Tallman, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.

Order PHILLIPS V. U.S. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROT.

ORDER

The panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Plaintiffs-Appellants’ petition for panel rehearing, dkt. 58, is DENIED. Judge Ikuta voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Tallman so recommended. Judge Schroeder recommended granting the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.