Buenrostro Murgia v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 30, 202423-428California876 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 30 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JORGE ALBERTO BUENROSTRO No. 23-428 MURGIA, Agency No.
A206-535-809
Petitioner,
v. MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 17, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: COLLINS, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Jorge Alberto Buenrostro Murgia petitions for review of a decision of the
Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming a decision by an Immigration
Judge (IJ) denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction
under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.…