Wietsma
Wietsma v. Foremost Ins. Co. of Grand Rapids CA3
Opinion
Opinion
Mesiwala, J.
Filed 5/30/24 Wietsma v. Foremost Ins. Co. of Grand Rapids CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sacramento) ----
KIMBERLY WIETSMA et al., C097885
Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Super. Ct. No. 34201700223969CUBTGDS) v.
FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY
OF GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN,
Defendant and Appellant.
In this insurance bad faith case, defendant Foremost Insurance Company of Grand Rapids, Michigan (Foremost) challenges a trial court’s award of attorney fees to prevailing plaintiffs Kimberly Wietsma, Renee Bradford, and Cindy Nugent under Brandt v. Superior Court (1985) 37 Cal.3d 813 (Brandt). Foremost contends the trial court erred: (1) by failing to apply two principles generally applicable to damage claims; (2) by…