Wietsma

Wietsma v. Foremost Ins. Co. of Grand Rapids CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 30, 2024C097885California4,859 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mesiwala, J.

Filed 5/30/24 Wietsma v. Foremost Ins. Co. of Grand Rapids CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

KIMBERLY WIETSMA et al., C097885

Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Super. Ct. No. 34201700223969CUBTGDS) v.

FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY

OF GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

In this insurance bad faith case, defendant Foremost Insurance Company of Grand Rapids, Michigan (Foremost) challenges a trial court’s award of attorney fees to prevailing plaintiffs Kimberly Wietsma, Renee Bradford, and Cindy Nugent under Brandt v. Superior Court (1985) 37 Cal.3d 813 (Brandt). Foremost contends the trial court erred: (1) by failing to apply two principles generally applicable to damage claims; (2) by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.