Quintanilla-Cortez

Quintanilla-Cortez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 31, 202423-1057California612 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 31 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JORGE ALBERTO QUINTANILLA- No. 23-1057 CORTEZ, Agency No.

A038-084-240

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 11, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and MENDOZA and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Jorge Alberto Quintanilla-Cortez, a citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision vacating the

immigration judge’s (IJ) grant of a waiver of inadmissibility under former § 212(c)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), codified at 8 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.