Wyer

Wyer v. Tesla, Inc. CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 31, 2024G062810California4,130 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gooding, J.

Filed 5/31/24 Wyer v. Tesla, Inc. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

DAVID WYER,

Plaintiff and Appellant, G062810

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2019-01118759)

TESLA, INC., et al., OPINION

Defendants and Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Richard Y. Lee, Judge. Affirmed. David Wyer, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Burke, Williams & Sorensen, Cheryl Johnson-Hartwell and Keiko J. Kojima for Defendants and Respondents. After his employment at Tesla, Inc. (Tesla) was terminated, David Wyer sued. Based on an arbitration provision in Wyer’s employment agreement, Tesla obtained an order from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.