McGee

McGee v. Auto Plus Towing CA1/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 31, 2024A168642California829 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/31/24 McGee v. Auto Plus Towing CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

ANTHONY McGEE, Plaintiff and Appellant,

A168642

v. AUTO PLUS TOWING, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. 22-CV-021498) Defendant and Respondent.

Appellant Anthony McGee secured a default judgment against respondent Auto Plus Towing but contends that he should have been awarded more money. In this memorandum opinion, we dismiss the appeal as untimely.1 This dispute arose in February 2022 after Auto Plus towed and impounded McGee’s car for the Oakland Police Department. Auto Plus sold the car in a lien proceeding after McGee failed to pay the towing and storage fees, but McGee had reason to believe that the car remained registered in his name.

1 A memorandum…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.