Flores
United States v. Flores
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 3 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-4002 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cr-00414-HDV v.
MEMORANDUM*
ANTHONY FLORES, AKA
BabyGfar; IVIN KITU SANFORD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Hernán D. Vera, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted May 16, 2024 Pasadena, California
Before: COLLINS, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
The United States appeals the district court’s pretrial ruling in limine
excluding flight evidence and evidence of a stolen car in the government’s criminal
prosecution of Anthony Flores and Ivin Kitu Sanford (together, “Defendants”). We
have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3731. We review a district court’s exclusion of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 403 for abuse of discretion. United States
v. Jayavarman,…