James Murphy v. Hannah Dockery-Mosebach

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 3 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES MICHAEL MURPHY, MD, No. 22-35392

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-01045-IM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

HANNAH DOCKERY-MOSEBACH;

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Karin J. Immergut, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 29, 2024**

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

James Michael Murphy appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging state law tort claims against Dockery-Mosebach and

the United States, which substituted itself as a defendant pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2679(d). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). district court’s dismissal for…