Thomas Lallande, IV v. Paul Penzone

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 3, 202423-15642California350 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 3 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

THOMAS J. LALLANDE IV, No. 23-15642

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00200-SMB-DMF

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAUL PENZONE, Sheriff, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 29, 2024**

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Thomas J. Lallande IV appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging a conditions-of-confinement

claim concerning the meals Lallande was provided as a pretrial detainee. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo cross-motions for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). summary judgment. Hamby v. Hammond, 821 F.3d 1085,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.