Taiming Zhang v. Apple, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 3, 202423-15740California219 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 3 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TAIMING ZHANG, No. 23-15740
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:23-cv-00972-TLT
v.
MEMORANDUM*
APPLE, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Trina L. Thompson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 29, 2024**
Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
Taiming Zhang appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his
request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in his action alleging various federal
and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
In his opening brief, Zhang failed to address the grounds for denial of his
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). request to proceed IFP and therefore has waived any such…