Djeneba Sidibe v. Sutter Health
103 F.4th 675
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 202422-15634California25,604 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DJENEBA SIDIBE; JERRY No. 22-15634
JANKOWSKI; SUSAN HANSEN;
DAVID HERMAN; OPTIMUM D.C. No. GRAPHICS, INC.; JOHNSON POOL 3:12-cv-04854-LB & SPA, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated,
OPINION
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
SUTTER HEALTH,
Defendant-Appellee, ______________________________
AETNA HEALTH OF
CALIFORNIA, INC.; AETNA LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY;
ANTHEM BLUE CROSS; BLUE
SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA; UNITED
HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.;
KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH
PLAN INC.,
Intervenors. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Laurel D. Beeler, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted August 24, 2023 San Francisco, California
Filed June 4, 2024
Before: Patrick J. Bumatay, Lucy H. Koh, and Roopali H. Desai, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Koh; Dissent by Judge Bumatay
SUMMARY*
California’s Cartwright Act
In an action brought by a certified class of individuals and businesses in Northern California who paid health care premiums to certain health plans (Plaintiffs), the panel…