Devin Andrich v. David Shinn

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 202422-16559California563 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DEVIN ANDRICH, No. 22-16559

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:17-cv-00047-RM v.

JULIA ERWIN, Legal Access Monitor at MEMORANDUM* Arizona Department of Corrections, ULIBARRI, First name unknown; named as Jane Doe Ulibarri, Paralegal at Arizona Department of Corrections, BEVERLY ULIBARRI, Paralegal at Arizona Department of Corrections, CHRISTINA PHILLIS, Director at Office of Public Defense Services, JANELLE A. MCEACHERN, Attorney licensed to practice law in Arizona, DAVID SHINN, ADC Director, Director,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Rosemary Marquez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 4, 2024** San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before:…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.