United States v. Lee

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 202423-898California896 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-898 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:19-cr-00081-ADA-BAM-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

DEENA VANG LEE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Ana I. de Alba, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 17, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: LEE and BRESS, Circuit Judges, and KANE, District Judge.***

Deena Vang Lee appeals the restitution portion of the sentence she received

upon convictions for wire fraud, aggravated identity theft, aiding and assisting the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Yvette Kane, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. preparation of false tax returns, and making…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.