Sterling Shaw v. Jay Inslee

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 202423-35417California318 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STERLING JAY SHAW, No. 23-35417

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:23-cv-05136-JLR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JAY INSLEE, Governor; JENNIFER STRUS, Legislative Ethics Board, Washington State,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington James L. Robart, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 29, 2024**

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Sterling Jay Shaw appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing

for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 his action challenging

COVID-19 vaccination policies. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review for an abuse of discretion. Omaya v. Sheehan (In re…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.