Sterling Shaw v. Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 202423-35394California320 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STERLING JAY SHAW, No. 23-35394

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00598-TL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL

TRANSIT AUTHORITY, D.U.N.S. #

958427239,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Tana Lin, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 29, 2024**

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Sterling Jay Shaw appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging breach of contract arising from his employer’s

COVID-19 vaccination mandate. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1).

Davidson v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.