Sterling Shaw v. Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 202423-35394California320 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 4 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STERLING JAY SHAW, No. 23-35394
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00598-TL
v.
MEMORANDUM*
CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL
TRANSIT AUTHORITY, D.U.N.S. #
958427239,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Tana Lin, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 29, 2024**
Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
Sterling Jay Shaw appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action alleging breach of contract arising from his employer’s
COVID-19 vaccination mandate. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1).