Tlatoani Teotl Tenamaxtle Trust Eto v. Shiela Polk

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 202423-55477California326 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TLATOANI-TEOTL TENAMAXTLE, No. 23-55477 TRUST ETO, Tenamxtle, Tlatoani-Teotl, beneficary, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-01107-RSH-BLM

Plaintiff-Appellant,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

SHIELA S. POLK, Yavapai County Attorney; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Robert S. Huie, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 29, 2024**

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Tlatoani-Teotl Tenamaxtle Trust ETO appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing its qui tam action under the False Claims Act

(“FCA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). of discretion. Pagtalunan v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.