Festus Ohan v. Charles Rettig
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 202423-35533California247 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 4 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FESTUS OKWUDILI OHAN, No. 23-35533
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:23-cv-00046-SLG
v.
MEMORANDUM*
CHARLES P. RETTIG; BRIAN WOOTEN;
MICHELLE JOHNSON; INTERNAL
REVENUE SERVICE; CALIFORNIA
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Sharon L. Gleason, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 29, 2024**
Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
Festus Okwudili Ohan appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action seeking to reopen a previous action relating to tax
assessments. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). In his opening brief, Ohan failed to address the grounds for…