Festus Ohan v. Charles Rettig

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 202423-35533California247 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FESTUS OKWUDILI OHAN, No. 23-35533

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:23-cv-00046-SLG

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CHARLES P. RETTIG; BRIAN WOOTEN;

MICHELLE JOHNSON; INTERNAL

REVENUE SERVICE; CALIFORNIA

FRANCHISE TAX BOARD,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Sharon L. Gleason, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 29, 2024**

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Festus Okwudili Ohan appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action seeking to reopen a previous action relating to tax

assessments. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). In his opening brief, Ohan failed to address the grounds for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.