Deshay Ford v. Michael Greenberg

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 202423-55699California371 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DESHAY D. FORD, No. 23-55699

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-08339-VBF-RAO

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MICHAEL GREENBERG; MICHAEL

AVILA; GARY LAVIGNA; CALIFORNIA

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS

BOARD,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Valerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 29, 2024**

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Deshay D. Ford appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims arising from an incident

involving a state agency judge and information officer. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.