Benjamin Barber v. Unitus Community Credit Union

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 202423-35062California477 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BENJAMIN BARBER, No. 23-35062

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-00134-MO

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITUS COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION;

REBECCA RICH, In her official capacity as branch manager for Unitus; JOHN DOE, In his official capacity as bank teller for Unitus,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 29, 2024**

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Benjamin Barber appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims concerning Barber’s

attempt to open a checking account and deposit a check. We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.